20170829
20170825
Aristotle on why young people will vote for sham sex marriage
"young people live by feeling, and have a main eye to their own pleasure and to the present moment."
Nicomachean Ethics 1156 a. 31-3
Nicomachean Ethics 1156 a. 31-3
Slogans
A few anti same-sex marriage slogans for your delight and amusement:
1. I don't believe in marriage 'equality'. I believe in marriage diversity -- male and female.
2. Not real sex equals not real marriage.
3. No possible zygote = no possible marriage.
4. Same sex sex? Not likely. Same sex marriage? Same!
5. Marriage 'equality'? Not equal for children.
6. Sham-sex marriage? Exactly!
7. Same-sex marriage = no babies, just dirty sheets.
8. Same-sex marriage? As useful as same-sex plumbing.
And for the blue at heart:
9. Don't fuck with us, we can't even fuck with each other.
There, that'll do. Free to use.
1. I don't believe in marriage 'equality'. I believe in marriage diversity -- male and female.
2. Not real sex equals not real marriage.
3. No possible zygote = no possible marriage.
4. Same sex sex? Not likely. Same sex marriage? Same!
5. Marriage 'equality'? Not equal for children.
6. Sham-sex marriage? Exactly!
7. Same-sex marriage = no babies, just dirty sheets.
8. Same-sex marriage? As useful as same-sex plumbing.
And for the blue at heart:
9. Don't fuck with us, we can't even fuck with each other.
There, that'll do. Free to use.
20170805
Same sex sham marriage.
Why would anyone think that a lifestyle arrangement that stifled the
production of new life had a any evolutionary role? It is a genetic
dead end and thus socially inert.
Every time I see a child I am reminded of the mockery of marriage in same-sex marriage, and the falsity of the claim to marriage 'equality'. Every child is a clear demonstration of the very inequality between a couple than can procreate and one that can only make a mess of the sheets.
There is no public policy benefit in attempting to solve the 'acceptance' problem of adults who opt to be different, act different or live different from those of us who make the next generation that pays all our bills in retirement (through taxes, investment and consumption).
Every time I see a child I am reminded of the mockery of marriage in same-sex marriage, and the falsity of the claim to marriage 'equality'. Every child is a clear demonstration of the very inequality between a couple than can procreate and one that can only make a mess of the sheets.
There is no public policy benefit in attempting to solve the 'acceptance' problem of adults who opt to be different, act different or live different from those of us who make the next generation that pays all our bills in retirement (through taxes, investment and consumption).
20170716
The pathetic chasing the irrelevant
A reporter in The Australian mentioned "How hurtful the debate got for [the alphabet soup]" when SSM was discussed in Ireland.
Nothing compared to the hurt to children who are likely to be isolated from at least one parent by government fiat, for the surrogate mothers in third world countries who are exploited by homosexual couples who admit that they are sexually inert and cannot produce children; so have to buy them, for the people drawn into the commoditisation of children. They are the hurts, but there is a flip side:
The humour.
The humour of people who engage in sham sex thinking that their private gymnastics have the social significance of couples whose real sexual intercourse often produces new life and thus the next generation.
The sad.
Sad that people with aberrant sexual dysfunction which represents a genetic dead end need a little badge from the government to tell them they are really truly OK, just like non-aberrant people, who are really truly OK.
The pathetic.
First homosexual practitioners wanted the law out of their bedrooms. Now they force their bedroom antics into the main street at every turn.
Nothing compared to the hurt to children who are likely to be isolated from at least one parent by government fiat, for the surrogate mothers in third world countries who are exploited by homosexual couples who admit that they are sexually inert and cannot produce children; so have to buy them, for the people drawn into the commoditisation of children. They are the hurts, but there is a flip side:
The humour.
The humour of people who engage in sham sex thinking that their private gymnastics have the social significance of couples whose real sexual intercourse often produces new life and thus the next generation.
The sad.
Sad that people with aberrant sexual dysfunction which represents a genetic dead end need a little badge from the government to tell them they are really truly OK, just like non-aberrant people, who are really truly OK.
The pathetic.
First homosexual practitioners wanted the law out of their bedrooms. Now they force their bedroom antics into the main street at every turn.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)