SSM: what it's really for.

Cori Bernardi recently debated Penny Wong on same-sex marriage.

Naturally Wong trotted out the usual distortions, avoiding the link between marriage, state interest, and orderly protection for and recognition of procreation; notwithstanding that some married people cannot or do not wish to procreate.

But, the heart of the matter is twofold:

1. regularising sexual perversion, (and the evolutionary exploitation that it involves) so that its practitioners don't have to feel opprobrium because of their GOTS practices; and
2. getting state endorsement and social acceptance of a system for procuring children by those whose sexual practices are perverted. At one go this cuts children off from at least one of their parents, places them in a distorted environment for their nurture (that is, one that has not been selected for by evolution) and exposes them to the risks of the Cinderella effect.

 Of course, the killer that rips the carpet from under the whole idea of same-sex sham marriage is children. To produce children the same sexers have to step outside the exclusivity of marriage to bring others in who will or might have no involvement with the child produced. Children converted to chattels. Back to point 2 above.