I saw a headline: "Prince"
I thought that was a great name for a royal baby.
20130724
20130702
Not married?
The headline was "Australian paedophile jailed (sic) for 40 years.
Being as he and his pal didn't have the sexual connection to procreate, they paid someone else to produce a baby; then took it.
Then they sexually abused the boy, from the get go, it seems.
Even the ABC reporter who interviewed this 'innovative' pair (not a couple...no coupling equipment on them) said that she thought they were just hunky dory: even 'loving' of their boy.
Not so, of course...and just how deceiving looks can be.
But, at least they weren't married!
Being as he and his pal didn't have the sexual connection to procreate, they paid someone else to produce a baby; then took it.
Then they sexually abused the boy, from the get go, it seems.
Even the ABC reporter who interviewed this 'innovative' pair (not a couple...no coupling equipment on them) said that she thought they were just hunky dory: even 'loving' of their boy.
Not so, of course...and just how deceiving looks can be.
But, at least they weren't married!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)