Most people would agree to marriage equality and
reform.
Well, equality we have: any couple can get married (couple
relating, of course, to sexual union; sexual union requiring male and
female...even plumbers recognise that). Reform? Why; what needs to be
reformed? Nothing that I can see.
When ‘reform’ and ‘equality’ are hijacked to promote the
legitimisation of sodomy, that’s a move to mask the depraved with the
honourable.
Marriage is regularised by the state, and so by
society, for the orderly having and raising of children, for the
children’s benefit, largely. If a couple doesn’t have children, then
they simply want to signal their exclusive sexual relationship.
I don’t see how sodomistic perversion needs or should have any place
in societies’ orderly structure as it has no relation to the having or
raising of children; indeed, as one commentator put it; it is more a
‘death-style’ than a life-style. Nor is it actually about sex, using
only one sex organ and one elimination organ (in many cases)
One hopes that with the inability of the rectum to host offspring,
that the practice of placing an organ or procreation inside an organ of
elimination would automatically entail the demise of the practice.
No comments:
Post a Comment